Mendel's Two Laws and the Chromosomal Theory of Inheritance
Law of Segregation
The two copies of each gene segregate (separate) into different gametes during the formation of eggs and sperm in the parents.
This explains the 3:1 ratio in the F2 generation.
Remember, this is only probabilistic.
Mendel's data from the F2 generation:
705 purple, 224 white
3.15 to 1 ratio
The more individuals studied, the closer the ratio comes to the “true” ratio (3:1).
At the time Mendel did his work, no one knew what chromosomes were, but it turns out that Mendel's Law of Segregation anticipated what chromosomes do in meiosis!
The Law of Segregation Illustrates What Chromosomes Do in Meiosis
There are parallels between what Mendel's elements of heredity do and what chromosomes do during meiosis.
Scientists noticed these after Mendel's famous paper was rediscovered in 1900.
These led to the Chromosomal Theory of Inheritance.
Chromosomes carry Mendel's elements of heredity.
Separation of homologous chromosomes in meiosis is responsible for the segregation of alleles in Mendel's experiments.
Unknown source
Law of Independent Assortment
Alleles of different genes assort independently during gamete formation.
This explains the 9:3:3:1 ratio in the F2 generation of a dihybrid cross.
Mendel's data from the F2 generation doesn't give a perfect ratio, but it is close enough since the process is the result of probabilities.
315:108:101:32 ≈ 9.84:3.38:3.16:1
The Law of Independent Assortment Illustrates What Chromosomes Do in Meiosis
The independent assortment of homologous chromosomes during meiosis explains the independent assortment of Mendel's units of heredity.
Unknown source
Chromosomal Theory of Inheritance
The chromosomal theory states that Mendel's units of heredity are located at specific places (loci) on chromosomes, and it is the chromosomes that undergo segregation and independent assortment.
Once this was accepted, around 1903, Mendel's laws of heredity, which were based on mathematical probabilities (and therefore rather abstract), were given a physical basis.
As a result, the science of genetics exploded.
50 years later the molecule of heredity was discovered: DNA.
75 years later genes were taken from one organism and spliced into another.
Reductionism: A Strategy that Works
Reductionism defined
An attempt or tendency to explain a complex set of facts, entities, phenomena, or structures by another, simpler set.
“For the last 400 years science has advanced by reductionism. The idea is that you could understand the world, all of nature, by examining smaller and smaller pieces of it. When assembled, the small pieces would explain the whole.” (John Holland)
Galileo, Newton, and Mendel took a reductionist approach to understanding the physical and biological world.
They broke nature down into little pieces that were simple and could be studied and understood.
Once they understood the simple laws upon which the universe is constructed, they could build up a more complex understanding.
This allowed major breakthroughs in understanding nature.
All Models are Partial Truths
While the reductionist approach has given us a foothold in understanding nature, in all cases the models of how the universe works are imperfect.
Gregor Mendel's amazing discovery of the Laws of Inheritance was an intellectual breakthrough of the first order—one of the greatest discoveries in the history of science.
However, Mendel ignored what he didn't understand and radically simplified things.
Mendel's Model
Peas have two versions, or alleles, of each gene. This also turns out to be true for many other organisms.
Alleles do not blend together. The hereditary determinants maintain their integrity from generation to generation. They do not blend together, and they do not acquire characteristics in response to actions by an individual (like a giraffe stretching its neck).
Each gamete contains one allele of each gene. Pairs of alleles segregate during the formation of gametes.
Males and females contribute equally to the genotype of their offspring. When gametes fuse, offspring acquire a total of two alleles for each gene—one from each parent.
Some alleles are dominant to others. When a dominant and recessive allele for the same gene are found in the same individual, that individual exhibits the dominant phenotype.
Mendel's First Partial Truth: Complete Dominance
Traits are not always either dominant or recessive.
What Mendel described in his famous pea experiments is now know as complete dominance.
One allele is completely dominant over another allele, which is termed recessive.
Example: if we examine the trait for plant height we see that it is controlled by two alleles.
T represents the tall allele and is dominant.
t represents the short allele and is recessive.
Both the TT and Tt genotypes correspond to the tall phenotype.
Reason: the T allele shows complete dominance over t.
Incomplete Dominance
In incomplete dominance, one allele of a pair isn't fully dominant over its partner.
It looks like blending is happening.
The F1 generation looks intermediate between the two parents.
Example: In snapdragons, the red flower allele (CR) is incompletely dominant to the white flower allele (CW).
The offspring of these two is halfway between them in color—it is pink!
That is, the heterozygous phenotype (CRCW) is somewhere in between the two homozygous phenotypes (CRCR and CWCW)
How does this work?
The CR allele codes for a red flower pigment; the CW does not code for a pigment.
The CRCR individual gets the full amount pigment, and is red.
The CRCW gets only half the amount of pigment, and looks pink.